U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Reed

United States v. Reed
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 27, 1998

United States v. Reed

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20371

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TARLETHA DIANE REED Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-96-CR-0229-3)

January 23, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Reed challenges her sentence on the grounds that she was entitled to discovery at sentencing and that the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act is unconstitutional. Reed’s arguments are without merit. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.