United States v. Lee
United States v. Lee
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-60418
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GARY BRIAN LEE,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (1:95-CR-119-D) _________________________________________________________________ January 14, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gary Brian Lee pleaded guilty to manufacturing and
possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute and to
assaulting and impeding federal officers. He now appeals the
district court’s judgment of conviction and sentence, arguing
that the district court erred in (1) finding that the conviction
of possession with intent to distribute involved more than 100
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. marijuana plants and (2) adjusting his base offense level for
possession of a firearm pursuant to § 2D1.1 (b)(1) of the
Sentencing Guidelines.
A district court’s finding regarding the quantity of drugs
attributable to a defendant is a factual finding that we review
for clear error. United States v. Rogers,
1 F.3d 341, 342(5th
Cir. 1993). We review a sentence imposed under the Sentencing
Guidelines to determine if it was imposed in violation of law or
as a result of an incorrect application of the guidelines, and we
“‘affirm applications of the guidelines when they are based on
factual findings that are not clearly erroneous.’” United States
v. Follin,
979 F.2d 369, 375(5th Cir. 1992). We have reviewed
the record and the briefs on appeal and find no reversible error.
We therefore AFFIRM the district court’s judgment of conviction
and sentence.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished