IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40231 Summary Calendar

CARLOS ARNULFO MARQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al, Defendants, PRIMO JOEL GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas UDC No. L-95-CV-92 - - - - - - - - - - January 28, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Carlos Arnulfo Marquez, no. 54677-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Marquez complained that the Government deprived him of his property without due process by destroying his possessions in Government custody without giving him prior notice. An intentional deprivation of property does * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 97-40231 -2- not offend due process if a meaningful post-deprivation remedy is available. Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984). Texas recognizes such a remedy. Myers v. Adams, 728 S.W.2d 771, 772 (Tex. 1987). Marquez should seek relief in the Texas state courts and not under Bivens. See Hudson, 468 U.S. at 533; Myers, 728 S.W.2d at 772.

Although the district court dismissed Marquez’s action as barred by the relevant statute of limitations, this court can and does affirm on the above alternative basis. See Bickford v. International Speedway Corp., 654 F.2d 1028, 1031 (5th Cir. 1981).

AFFIRMED.