United States v. Williams
United States v. Williams
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50520
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SCOTT WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-97-CA-081 - - - - - - - - - - February 4, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Scott Williams has applied to this court for a certificate
of appealability relative to the district court’s denial of
28 U.S.C. § 2255relief from his sentence for conspiring to
distribute methamphetamine. The application is DENIED.
Williams’s contentions that he is entitled to relief on
authority of
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) or
28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the
All Writs Act, have no merit. Therefore, the district court’s
denial of relief on these claims is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50520 -2-
The court will not consider, on the merits, Williams’s
contention that he is entitled to
28 U.S.C. § 2241habeas corpus
relief because the § 2255 remedy is inadequate and ineffective.
Williams presents this claim for the first time on appeal, and he
has not attempted to show that plain error was implicated. See
United States v. Calverley,
37 F.3d 160, 162-164(5th Cir. 1994)
(en banc).
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished