U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Valadez

United States v. Valadez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 3, 1998

United States v. Valadez

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50932 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMANDO VALADEZ, JR., also known as Armando Valdez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-96-CR-35-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 20, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Counsel was appointed by this court to assist Armando Valadez, Jr., in challenging the district court’s determination that any appeal would be frivolous, thus denying Valadez leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP). Court-appointed counsel has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s briefs, Valadez’s responses, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 96-50932 -2- issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Valadez’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.