Splawn v. Apfel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Splawn v. Apfel

Opinion

CORRECTED

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-20554 Summary Calendar _____________________

ADELA SPLAWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CV-775 _________________________________________________________________ March 17, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adela Splawn appeals from the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of her application for supplemental security

income. She argues that substantial evidence did not exist to

support the finding that she was not disabled, and that there were

errors of law made while determining her disability status. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. stated by the district court. See Splawn v. Chater, No. 96-775

(S.D. Tex. June 12, 1997).

A F F I R M E D.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished