United States v. Robertson
United States v. Robertson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-40814 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLAY ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-154-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Clay Robertson appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute. Robertson argues that the district court erred in imposing a sentence adjustment for obstruction of justice pursuant to United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual, § 3C1.1. This argument was not raised before the district court. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we AFFIRM. Based on the district court’s adoption of the Presentence Investigation Report, we find that no plain error was committed. See United States v. Vital, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-40814 -2- 68 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Lopez, 923 F.2d 47, 49 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.