Griffin v. Landmark Const
Griffin v. Landmark Const
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit
No. 97-50771 Summary Calendar
MICHELLE R. GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas (W-96-CV-475) April 3, 1998
Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michelle Griffin sued her former employer, Landmark
Construction Corporation, in a state district court asserting that
she was wrongfully terminated from her employment in violation of
the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. The case was removed
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. from the state district court to the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas on diversity of citizenship. In
federal court, Landmark filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the
grounds that Griffin had failed to raise a genuine issue of fact as
to sexual discrimination being the reason for her termination. The
district court concluded that the summary judgment evidence
established that Landmark terminated Griffin for legitimate non-
discriminatory reasons and there was no summary judgment evidence
that these reasons were pretextual. Accordingly, the district
court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment and entered a Final
Judgment dismissing Griffin’s claims.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the
record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For
the reasons set forth by the district court in its Order filed
under date of August 28, 1997, we have determined that the Final
Judgment entered under date of August 28, 1997, should be, and it
is hereby, AFFIRMED.
g:\opin\97-50771.opn 2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished