Park Natl Bank v. Kaminetzky,et al
Park Natl Bank v. Kaminetzky,et al
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-21054 Summary Calendar
PARK NATIONAL BANK OF HOUSTON,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, ET AL
Defendants
DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 96-CV-495 - - - - - - - - - - December 2, 1998
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Dov Avni Kaminetzky’s appeal brief is not in compliance with
Fed. R. App. P. 28. Although the court construes pro se briefs
liberally, arguments must be briefed to be preserved. Price v.
Digital Equipment Corp.,
846 F.2d 1026, 1028(5th Cir. 1988).
Kaminetzky has failed to brief any arguments and has failed to
address in any meaningful way any error on the part of the
district court pertaining to the sanction order. See Fed. R.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 96-21054 - 2 -
App. P. 28(a)(6). Park National Bank of Houston’s motion to
dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as
frivolous as for failure generally to comply with Fed. R. App. P.
28.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished