IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21054 Summary Calendar

PARK NATIONAL BANK OF HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, ET AL Defendants DOV AVNI KAMINETZKY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 96-CV-495 - - - - - - - - - - December 2, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Dov Avni Kaminetzky’s appeal brief is not in compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 28. Although the court construes pro se briefs liberally, arguments must be briefed to be preserved. Price v. Digital Equipment Corp., 846 F.2d 1026, 1028 (5th Cir. 1988).

Kaminetzky has failed to brief any arguments and has failed to address in any meaningful way any error on the part of the district court pertaining to the sanction order. See Fed. R. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 96-21054 - 2 - App. P. 28(a)(6). Park National Bank of Houston’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous as for failure generally to comply with Fed. R. App. P. 28.

DISMISSED.