Black v. Bennett
Black v. Bennett
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50955 Summary Calendar
JOHN RUFUS BLACK, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TROY C. BENNETT, JR.; ABEL ACOSTA, also known as Unknown Deputy Clerk,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-96-CV-97 - - - - - - - - - - December 7, 1998
Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John Rufus Black, Jr., Texas state prisoner # 607439, has
appealed the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of his
claims for monetary damages against Troy C. Bennett, Jr., Clerk
of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; and Abel Acosta, a deputy
clerk of that court. We AFFIRM.
Black’s action is based on the appellees’ refusal to file
his motion for rehearing of the Texas court’s denial of his
application for discretionary review of the affirmance of his
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50955 -2-
criminal conviction and sentence. However, Black has failed to
contest the district court’s ruling that the appellees are
entitled to quasi-judicial immunity from liability for damages
relative to appellees’ said refusal to file. See Antoine v.
Byers & Anderson,
508 U.S. 429, 436(1993); Williams v. Wood,
612 F.2d 982, 985(5th Cir. 1980).
Black’s failure to brief the issue whether the appellees are
entitled to summary judgment on grounds of quasi-judicial
immunity constitutes a waiver of that issue on appeal. See Webb
Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates of North Texas,
139 F.3d 532,
536 n.3 (5th Cir. 1998). The district court’s said ruling is
dispositive of Black’s claims for damages based on
42 U.S.C. § 1983and his supplemental state-law claim that appellees
intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon him.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished