U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1998

Black v. Bennett

Black v. Bennett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 16, 1998

Black v. Bennett

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50955 Summary Calendar

JOHN RUFUS BLACK, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TROY C. BENNETT, JR.; ABEL ACOSTA, also known as Unknown Deputy Clerk, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-96-CV-97 - - - - - - - - - - December 7, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* John Rufus Black, Jr., Texas state prisoner # 607439, has appealed the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of his claims for monetary damages against Troy C. Bennett, Jr., Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; and Abel Acosta, a deputy clerk of that court. We AFFIRM.

Black’s action is based on the appellees’ refusal to file his motion for rehearing of the Texas court’s denial of his application for discretionary review of the affirmance of his * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 97-50955 -2- criminal conviction and sentence. However, Black has failed to contest the district court’s ruling that the appellees are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity from liability for damages relative to appellees’ said refusal to file. See Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, 508 U.S. 429, 436 (1993); Williams v. Wood, 612 F.2d 982, 985 (5th Cir. 1980).

Black’s failure to brief the issue whether the appellees are entitled to summary judgment on grounds of quasi-judicial immunity constitutes a waiver of that issue on appeal. See Webb Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates of North Texas, 139 F.3d 532, n.3 (5th Cir. 1998). The district court’s said ruling is dispositive of Black’s claims for damages based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and his supplemental state-law claim that appellees intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon him.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.