United States v. Hale
United States v. Hale
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-41543 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
versus
JESSIE WADE HALE,
Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CR-42-3 - - - - - - - - - -
March 11, 1999
Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Jessie Wade Hale appeals his sentence for
possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine arguing that
the district court erred by attributing 764.45 grams to him when
determining his offense level. The Government appeals the
district court’s failure to sentence Hale as a career offender
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.
We have reviewed the record and briefs submitted by the
parties and hold that the district court erred in determining
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-41543 -2-
that Hale’s two prior felony convictions were related, and thus,
holding that Hale was not subject to the career offender
guideline. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2) & comment.(n.3); see also
United States v. Ford,
996 F.2d 83, 85(5th Cir. 1993); United
States v. Garcia,
962 F.2d 479, 482(5th Cir. 1992). Any error
with regard to the district court’s inclusion of the 764.45 grams
of methamphetamine in Hale’s offense level is harmless inasmuch
as it would not affect Hale’s sentence as a career offender
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.
Accordingly, we VACATE Hale’s sentence and REMAND for
resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished