United States v. Burgos
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 97-11398 _____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
HERNAN ENRIQUE BURGOS,
Defendant-Appellant, and OLGA BURGOS,
Appellant. _______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:96-CR-55-1-A)
_______________________________________________________
May 11, 1999
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Because the Burgos’ attorney, Arch McColl, testified adversely to Judge McBryde in the proceedings of the investigatory committee of the Fifth Circuit, the motion for recusal should have been granted. United States v. Anderson, 160 F.3d 231 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Avilez-Reyes, 160 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 1998).
The court’s order determining ownership of the bond money and granting the Government’s request to apply it against the fine imposed on Hernan Burgos, is vacated. The case is remanded for reassignment to a different judge.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.