United States v. Topsy
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41059 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN HENRY TOPSY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-91-CR-303-1 - - - - - - - - - - May 12, 1999
Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John Henry Topsy (#55462-079), has applied for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) for an appeal from the dismissal of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and of his application for a writ of audita querela. Topsy does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that his § 2255 motion is time-barred.
Even if it is assumed that the writ of audita querela survives as a vehicle for challenging criminal convictions, it is not available to Topsy because the issue he wishes to raise does not involve a legal defense which arose after the judgment. See United States v. Banda, 1 F.3d 354, 356 (5th Cir. 1993). The request for a COA is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY and the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.