Vappie v. USA
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit _____________________________________
No. 98-20143 _____________________________________
DAVID JOSEPH VAPPIE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
WILLIAM A. HENDERSON, Post Master; AND
STAN SARTAIN
Defendants-Appellees.
_______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-97-CV-1333) _____________________________________
May 26, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, REYNALDO G. GARZA, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Three issues are raised by the Appellant, David Joseph Vappie (“Vappie”), on appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”) on Vappie’s race discrimination claim; (2) whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Vappie’s motion for a continuance; and (3) whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Postal Service on Vappie’s hostile work environment claim. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, the district court’s opinion, and hearing oral argument, we conclude that the district court did not err in its findings of fact or in its application of the law. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s holdings.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.