Brown v. Emerson Electric Co
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT _________________
No. 98-30613
Summary Calendar _________________
REGINALD BROWN,
Plaintiff,
KEVIN P. GIPSON,
Appellant, versus
EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY; LOUISVILLE LADDER CO,
INC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (97-CV-3117-L)
July 1, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant, Kevin P. Gipson, appeals the district court’s order requiring him to pay $750.00 in attorneys’ fees to the Defendant-Appellees. The district court sanctioned Gipson for his repeated refusals to comply with discovery orders, as well as his failure to appear before the court for numerous motion hearings. The imposition of sanctions is a matter of discretion for the district court, which we review only for abuse. See Shipes v. Trinity Industries, 987 F.2d 311, 323 (5th Cir. 1993). An attorney may be held liable for reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by his failure to comply with discovery. See id.
In his appellate brief, Gipson attempts to explain his failure to attend one particular hearing. However, he provides no basis for reversing the district court’s imposition of sanctions. The sanctions stemmed from numerous incidents in which Gipson failed to comply with court orders and failed to appear at hearings. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sanctions.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.