U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1999

Pickle v. Puckett

Pickle v. Puckett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 16, 1999
Pickle v. Puckett

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60566

USDC No. 4:96-CV-347-S-A

C.D. PICKLE, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

STEVE PUCKETT, Superintendent, Mississippi

State Penitentiary; ED HARGETT, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary; JAMES ANDERSON, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary; ANN LEE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi --------------------

July 14, 1999

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

C. D. Pickle, Jr. (“Pickle”), Mississippi prisoner # 31459, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A) requires that the notice of appeal be filed within 30 days of the entry of a final judgment in a civil action. A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Carr, 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985).

No. 98-60566 -2-

Pickle’s notice of appeal was not timely filed within 30 days of the entry of the district court’s final judgment. The last day for filing a timely notice of appeal was August 14, 1998. Pickle could have delivered his notice of appeal to prison officials no earlier than August 19, 1998. Therefore, Pickle’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and his accompanying motion to compel discovery is DENIED AS MOOT.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY DENIED AS MOOT.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.