IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30566 Conference Calendar

JUVENTINO MUNOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARTIN C. LENSING, Warden, Hunt Correctional Center; LINDA C. WILSON, Hospital Administrator, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Defendants-Appellees.

* * * * * * * * * * JUVENTINO MUNOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 95-CV-1690 95-CV-2021 - - - - - - - - - - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Juventino Munoz (Louisiana prisoner # 352797) has filed a motion for permission to appeal, in forma pauperis (IFP), the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 98-30566 -2- district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint.

Munoz is BARRED by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from proceeding IFP because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, he has brought an action or appeal in a United States Court that was dismissed for frivolousness, for maliciousness, or for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted and because he has not established that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996); Munoz v. Jambon, 94-CV-4192-J (E.D. La.; Feb. 10, 1995), aff’d, No. 95-31304 (5th Cir.; Aug. 21, 1996); Munoz v. Simone, CA-95-2559-L (E.D. La.; Oct. 30, 1995), aff’d, No. 95- 31143 (5th Cir; Aug. 20, 1996); Munoz v. Garrison, 95-CV-1691 (M.D. La.; Jan. 28, 1997).

Accordingly, Munoz’s motion for IFP is DENIED and his appeal is DISMISSED. Should he wish to reinstate his appeal, Munoz has days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court. All other outstanding motions by Munoz are DENIED.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.