United States v. Shipman
United States v. Shipman
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-51134 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRANDY MICHELE SHIPMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-98-CR-656-3 -------------------- October 19, 1999
Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Brandy Michele Shipman appeals her jury conviction for
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in
violation of
21 U.S.C. §§ 841and 846. She argues that she was
constructively denied the assistance of counsel at her sentencing
hearing. The record is sufficiently developed to consider
Shipman’s claim on direct appeal. See United States v. Scott,
159 F.3d 916, 924(5th Cir. 1998). Shipman had counsel at the
sentencing hearing who reasserted her objections to the
Presentence Report, argued that she should be sentenced at the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-51134 -2-
low end of the guideline range, that the district court recommend
sending her to boot camp, and that she be allowed to remain on
bond pending appeal. Therefore, Shipman was not constructively
denied counsel at the sentencing hearing. See United States v.
Cronic,
466 U.S. 648, 658-59(1984).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished