King v. Sparkman
King v. Sparkman
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60520 Conference Calendar
SEBASTIAN KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus E. L. SPARKMAN; RENNIE HOLT, Corrections Officer, Marshall County Correctional Facility; TODD GUELKER, Assistant Warden, Marshall County Correctional Facility; MARSHALL COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, HOLLY SPRINGS, MISSISSIPPI; WACKENHUT CORRECTIONS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:97-CV-30-B-A - - - - - - - - - - October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Sebastian King, a Mississippi inmate (# 62506), appeals from the district court’s entry of judgment for the defendants following a nonjury trial of his pro se civil rights action.
King argues that, before trial, the district court erred in denying his discovery request. Because King has not shown that
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-60520 -2- he was prejudiced by such denial, he has not shown that the district court abused its discretion. See Marshall v. Norwood, 741 F.2d 761, 764 (5th Cir. 1984).
King has neither provided a transcript of the trial nor sought production of a transcript at government expense, as is his responsibility. See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 415- (5th Cir. 1990); FED. R. APP. P. 10(b). To the extent that King challenges the judgment that resulted from the trial, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Richardson, 902 F.2d at 416.
King has failed to brief arguments with respect to the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of the defendants other than Holt. Any claims against those defendants have thus been abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9). The judgment is AFFIRMED as to these remaining claims.
DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.