Haynes v. Copco Steel
Haynes v. Copco Steel
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
99-20086 Summary Calendar __________________
LARRY HAYNES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COPCO STEEL, doing business as Russel Metals Co. Inc.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-98-CV-368) ______________________________________________
September 30, 1999
Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larry Haynes appeals from an adverse summary judgment
dismissing his claims against appellee Copco Steel Company d/b/a
Russel Metals. Haynes argues that the district court erred in
dismissing both his breach of contract claim and his promissory
estoppel claim. We find no merit in the arguments advanced by
Haynes. After a careful review of the arguments presented on
appeal and a de novo review of the record, we affirm the judgment
of the district court, essentially for the reasons stated in the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. succinct and well-reasoned Memorandum and Order of the district
court dated December 28, 1998.
AFFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished