Bailey v. Johnson
Bailey v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50854 Summary Calendar
DEREK MITCHELL BAILEY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CV-742 --------------------
November 12, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Derek Mitchell Bailey, Texas prisoner #689542, appeals the
denial of 28 U.S.C. 2254 relief. With respect to the sole issue
on which a certificate of appealability was granted, Bailey
contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to
move for a change of venue.
The Constitution does not require that jurors be totally
ignorant of the facts and issues to be tried. Irvin v. Dowd,
366 U.S. 717, 722(1961). Furthermore, Bailey’s conclusional
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50854 -2-
allegations of bias fail to demonstrate that the trial atmosphere
was “utterly corrupted by press coverage.” Dobbert v. Florida,
432 U.S. 282, 302(1977). Accordingly, trial counsel was not
ineffective in failing to move for a change of venue. See
Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 687(1984).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished