United States v. Ramsey
United States v. Ramsey
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-10754 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES WATSON RAMSEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-59-ALL --------------------
October 20, 1999
Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James Watson Ramsey, federal prisoner #28081-077, appeals
from the district court’s denial of his motion for new trial
following his guilty-plea conviction for use of fire to commit
mail fraud. Ramsey argues that the district court lacked
jurisdiction to convict and sentence him, that the factual resume
for his guilty plea did not contain evidence of the essential
elements of the offense, that he was improperly sentenced
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4 for using explosives, and that the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-10754 -2-
Government made false statements to the district court regarding
the evidence to support his alleged crime. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Ramsey has not satisfied
the Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 standards for the granting of a new
trial. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion
by denying his motion for new trial. See United States v.
Jaramillo,
42 F.3d 920, 924(5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished