Sims v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sims v. Smith

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11481 Conference Calendar

CLIFFORD D. SIMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLIE SMITH, Sheriff, Lynn County Jail; MIGUEL REYNA, Jail Administrator, Lynn County Jail; JASON McMILLAN, Jailer, Lynn County Jail; BOBBY JORDAN, Ex-Jail Administrator, Lynn County Jail,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CV-191 --------------------

October 20, 1999

Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clifford D. Sims, Texas prisoner #830977, appeals from the

dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Sims contends

that his constitutional rights were violated because he was left

alone with another prisoner; that his rights were violated by his

punishment after he drank three beers on work release while a

prisoner who possessed marijuana received a lesser penalty; that

a jailer deprived him of adequate medical care by depriving him

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-11481 -2-

of skin cream for four hours; that the conditions of his

confinement were unconstitutional because the dayroom toilet was

backed up with feces for eight days; and that jail policy

unconstitutionally deprived him and other prisoners of medical

care on the basis of indigency.

Sims did not allege any physical injury arising from being

left alone with the other prisoner, being deprived of skin cream

for four hours, or being exposed to feces in the dayroom toilet.

Sims stated no nonfrivolous claims for damages regarding those

incidents. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e). Regarding his punishment for

drinking beer while on work release, Sims has not shown that his

jailers distinguished between two relevant groups or that any

fundamental right was at stake, as he must do to show an Equal

Protection Clause violation. Lavernia v. Lynaugh,

845 F.2d 493, 496

(5th Cir. 1988). Finally, Sims has failed to brief his

contention that jail policy deprived him and other prisoners of

medical care on the basis of indigency. Brinkmann v. Dallas

County Deputy Sheriff Abner,

813 F.2d 744, 748

(5th Cir. 1987).

Sims’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The

dismissal of Sims’s action by the district court counts as a

strike and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a

second strike for purposes of

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). We caution

Sims that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed

in forma pauperis (IFP) in any civil action or appeal filed while

he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). No. 98-11481 -3-

APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished