Cathey v. US IRS
Cathey v. US IRS
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-21035
ADELINE RUDEL CATHEY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
US INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendant-Appellee.
_______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-97-CV-2287) _______________________________
October 27, 1999
Before GARWOOD, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Adeline Rudel Cathey (“Cathey”) appeals from the
district court’s determination that
26 U.S.C. § 6334(a)(7)
forbids only the levy of funds payable, as opposed to those paid,
as worker’s compensation. Appellee the United States—apart from
defending the decision of the district court—contends that
Cathey’s lawsuit was untimely filed.
The gravamen of Cathey’s complaint is that the IRS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. wrongfully levied funds paid to her as worker’s compensation.
For essentially the same reasons as the district court, in its
order of October 5, 1998, we agree that § 6334(a)(7) does not
prohibit a levy of funds already paid—as opposed to payable—as
worker’s compensation. Accordingly, we pretermit a discussion of
the applicability of the two year statute of limitations in
26 U.S.C. § 7433(d)(3) and express no opinion on the district
court’s determination of the limitations issue.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished