United States v. Harrison
United States v. Harrison
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-20164 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERRICK LAMONT HARRISON, also known Derek LNU, also known as Dirty D, also known as Feliciano C Green
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-188-2 --------------------
October 20, 1999
Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Derrick Lamont Harrison appeals his sentence imposed as a
result of his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess
with intent to distribute over 50 grams of cocaine base (commonly
known as “crack”) and aiding and abetting the possession of over
50 grams of cocaine base in violation of
21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),
841(b)(1)(A)(iii), and 846.
Harrison argues that the district court erred in refusing to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-20164 -2-
grant a downward departure pursuant to § 5K2.0. Harrison
contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying
his request for a downward departure for substantial assistance
rendered, even though the Government did not move for such a
departure under § 5K1.1. Harrison, however, does not contend
that the district court was unaware it had the authority to
depart downward pursuant to § 5K2.0, that it misapplied the
Guidelines, or that it violated the law in refusing to grant a
downward departure. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the
district court’s discretionary conclusion not to grant a downward
departure. United States v. Lugman,
130 F.3d 113, 115(5th Cir.
1997).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished