United States v. Perez-Rodriguez
United States v. Perez-Rodriguez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40201 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LUIS PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-563-1 --------------------
November 10, 1999
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Luis Perez Rodriguez (Perez) appeals his conviction
after pleading guilty to illegal reentry of a deported alien in
violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(2). He argues that the
district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his
prior deportation. Perez submits that the expedited removal
procedures used by the Immigration and Naturalization Service
(INS) denied him of due process of law.
Inasmuch as the INS complied with the procedures set forth
in
8 U.S.C. § 1228, Perez’s prior deportation was admissible
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-40201 -2-
evidence for purposes of the instant conviction. See United
States v. Benitez-Villafuerte,
186 F.3d 651, 657-58(5th Cir.
1999). Even if the INS had not complied with § 1228,
Perez does not make a showing that, but for the purported errors,
he would not have been deported. Id. at 658-59. Perez’s
argument that his due process rights were further violated
because the INS had a pecuniary interest in deporting him because
its budget is determined by the number of aliens it apprehends
and deports was rejected by this court in Benitez-Villafuerte.
Id. at 660.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished