United States v. Pruitt
United States v. Pruitt
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40421 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARGIE PRUITT,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-17-2 --------------------
November 5, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Argie Pruitt appeals the district court’s denial of his
motion for acquittal in his trial for conspiracy to distribute
marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute.
The evidence presented in this case, and reasonable inferences
drawn therefrom, showed that Pruitt was present in a known drug
location at a time when he might not otherwise have been expected
to be present, that he did not express surprise or confusion when
Culps arrived at his house, that he took possession of a box
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-40421 -2-
containing marijuana and acknowledged that he was aware of its
contents, that he attempted to prevent detection by police by
preventing entry into the premises, and that he was in possession
of a small quantity of marijuana and drug distribution
paraphernalia. Such evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s
verdict. See United States v. Espinoza-Seanez,
862 F.2d 526, 536(5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Gonzalez,
121 F.3d 928, 936(5th Cir. 1997).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished