U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Gardea-Luna

United States v. Gardea-Luna
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 21, 1999

United States v. Gardea-Luna

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-50055 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

RAUL GARDEA-LUNA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-98-CR-107-16 -------------------- October 20, 1999 Before JONES, WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Raul Gardea-Luna appeals from the district court’s denial of his “Motion to Enforce Plea Bargain,” which was filed shortly after judgment was rendered in the above-styled case. Gardea’s motion was “unauthorized” because the relief he sought was not available under any federal rule or statute providing for post- conviction relief. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141- (5th Cir. 1994). Relief was not available to Gardea under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, 35, or 36, or 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See id.; 28 * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-50055 -2-

U.S.C. § 2255. Although the district court denied Gardea’s motion on the merits, it should have denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Early, 27 F.3d at 142. This court may affirm on that alternative ground. See id. AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.