Watt v. Rodriguez
Watt v. Rodriguez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50496 Conference Calendar
SOLOMON G. WATT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Chairman of Texas Board of Pardons and Parole; GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-99-CV-42-F - - - - - - - - - -
October 20, 1999
Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Solomon G. Watt, Texas prisoner # 460844, appeals the
district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983suit. On appeal, Watt contends that he is unconstitutionally
imprisoned beyond the maximum sentence imposed by the trial
court. He seeks monetary damages and attorney’s fees.
Watt’s suit is not cognizable under § 1983. See Heck v.
Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 486-87(1994). To recover damages for an
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-50496 -2-
allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment, or for
harms caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render a
conviction or sentence invalid, a § 1983 plaintiff must first
prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct
appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state
tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into
question by a federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas
corpus. Id. Watt has neither alleged nor proven that his
imprisonment has been invalidated. Accordingly, the district
court’s order dismissing Watt’s suit as frivolous pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) is AFFIRMED.
The district court’s dismissal counts as a strike against
Watt. See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383, 387(5th Cir. 1996)
(affirmance of district court’s dismissal as frivolous counts as
a single strike). Watt is cautioned that if he accumulates three
strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action
or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any
facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical
injury. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished