UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________

No. 99-10040 _______________________

IN THE MATTER OF: BILLY RAY DELP, JR.,

Debtor.

HBF FINANCIAL, LTD.,

Appellee,

versus

BILLY RAY DELP, JR.,

Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:96-CV-235-Y) _________________________________________________________________

December 14, 1999

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court has carefully considered the briefs, oral

arguments of counsel, and the lower courts’ orders in order to

determine whether we have appellate jurisdiction. The parties are

well aware of this court’s settled jurisprudence that when a

district court, sitting in review of a bankruptcy court judgment,

remands the case to the bankruptcy court for significant further

proceedings, this court lacks jurisdiction over the district

court’s order. See, e.g., Beal Bank, S.S.B. v. Caddo Parish-Villas

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. South, Ltd., (Matter of Caddo Parish-Villas South, Ltd.),

(5th Cir. 1999). Viewed in light of this jurisprudence, it

appears to us that the district court’s opinion on appeal intended

to remand this case for some type of significant further

proceedings in the bankruptcy court. This conclusion is reinforced

by the district court’s pointed reference to the fact that the

bankruptcy court “did not base its ruling on any of the other

arguments raised in Delp’s brief.”

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

2