Benton v. Taylor
Benton v. Taylor
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________________________________
No. 99-40127 Summary Calender _________________________________________
WILLIE BENTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY TAYLOR, Correctional Officer; JIMMY PACE, Correctional Captain,
Defendants-Appellees. __________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 9:96-CV-82 __________________________________________
November 23, 1999
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM 1:
Willie Benton, a Texas prisoner (#537558), appeals from the district court’s order
granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants Jeffery Taylor and Jimmy Pace in
Benton’s
42 U.S.C. Section 1983civil rights action.
In deciding Benton’s excessive force claim, the district court relied upon our decision in
Siglar v. Hightower,
112 F.3d 191(5th Cir. 1997), to conclude that Benton’s injries were de
minimis and thus could not form the basis of a Section 1983 claim. The district court did not have
the benefit of our recent decision in Gomez v. Chandler,
163 F.3d 921(5th Cir. 1999), in which
we elaborated upon the defeinitnion of “de minimis” injuries in a factual context more similar to
the instant case than Siglar. There remain genuine issues of material fact about, inter alia, whether
the application of force was even necessary in Benton’s case, whether defendant Taylor’s assault
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. caused Benton any long-lasting injuries. The district court’s order granting summary judgment
further proceeding in light of Gomez.
Benton’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED as unnecessary.
VACATED AND REMANDED; REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
DENIED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished