Mungia v. Lopez
Mungia v. Lopez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40492 Summary Calendar
FELIX J. MUNGIA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
OSCAR LOPEZ, Jim Wells, County Sheriff; JOE RODRIGUEZ, Jail Administrator; ROBERT ROLDAN, Sergeant, Jailer,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-98-CV-538 - - - - - - - - - -
November 24, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Felix J. Mungia, Texas prisoner #833729, appeals from the
dismissal of his lawsuit filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983as
frivolous. Mungia alleged that he had been denied his
constitutional right of meaningful access to the courts through
adequate law libraries or assistance from legally-trained
personnel. The district court may dismiss an in forma pauperis
complaint as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) if it
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-40492 -2-
lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. Siglar v. Hightower,
112 F.3d 191, 193(5th Cir. 1997). We review such a dismissal for an
abuse of discretion.
Id.Regarding his instant claims, Mungia failed to allege that
he was denied legal assistance by his court-appointed counsel or
that he suffered an actual injury due to the alleged deprivation.
See Lewis v. Casey,
518 U.S. 343, 351-55(1996)(actual injury
requirement); Mann v. Smith,
796 F.2d 79, 83-84(5th Cir.
1986)(denied legal assistance). The district court therefore did
not abuse its discretion in dismissing the instant lawsuit as
frivolous.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished