U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Hickman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 20, 1999 · Barksdale, Benavides, Davis, Demoss, Dennis, Duhé, Garza, Higginbotham, Jolly, Jones, King, Parker, Politz, Smith, Stewart, Wiener

165 F.3d 1020; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 721; 1999 WL 22968 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

John B. Stevens, Jr., Paul E. Ñaman, Keith Fredrick Giblin, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Frank Warren Henderson, Amy R. Blal-ock, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Baylor (6th Cir. 2008)
United States v. Hickman (5th Cir. 1999)
Montague v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2019)
United States v. Baylor (6th Cir. 2008)
United States v. Arclese (5th Cir. 2002)
United States v. Whooten (1st Cir. 2002)
United States v. Paul R. Whooten (1st Cir. 2002)
United States v. Hickman (5th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Quintus Smith (6th Cir. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC AS TO APPELLANTS MARKUS D. CHOPANE AND EDWIN T. LIMBRICK

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc filed by Markus D. Cho-pane and Edwin T. Limbrick, and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in *1021favor of granting the rehearings en banc; and, a majority of judges in active service having determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear the appeals of Masontae Hickman, Jyi R. McCray and Edmond Gasaway en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these causes shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that under 5th Cir. R. 42.1, the mandate issued in the appeals of Masontae Hickman, Jyi R. McCray and Edmond Gasaway are recalled to prevent injustice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.