U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1999

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1999 · Barksdale, Benavides, Davis, Demoss, Dennis, Duhé, Garza, Higginbotham, Jolly, Jones, King, Parker, Politz, Smith, Stewart, Wiener
169 F.3d 216 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Gregory Bryan Friel, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, Mark L. Gross, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC, for Inter-venor Plaintiff-Appellee., Robert L. Hammonds, Hammonds & Sills, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellee., James Carl Hrdlicka, Baton Rouge, LA, Gina Puleio Campo, Bolinger & Walker, New Orleans, LA, for Appellant.

Valley v. Rapides Parish School Board

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN *217BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en bane with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.