Scott v. Century Cellunet
Scott v. Century Cellunet
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60798
TRAYCEE S. SCOTT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
CENTURY CELLUNET, JANECE YOUNG, ROBERT BURGESS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (1:97-CV-565-RG)
February 9, 2000
Before POLITZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.
PER CURIAM:**
After reviewing the record and considering the briefs and
argument of counsel, we are persuaded that the district court
correctly granted summary judgment in this case. Assuming without
deciding that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, she produced no summary judgment evidence that tended to refute the
non-discriminatory reasons the employer gave for refusing to
promote her or tending to show that those reasons were pretextual.
On Scott’s disparate wage claim, the employer rectified the seven
* Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. cent per hour disparity as soon as it was called to the employer’s
attention and plaintiff established no monetary loss from this
disparity.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished