U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

Berkley v. First Natl Bnk Rotan

Berkley v. First Natl Bnk Rotan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 16, 2000

Berkley v. First Natl Bnk Rotan

Opinion

No. 99-10975 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10975 Conference Calendar

CHARLES LEIGH BERKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ROTAN, Ballinger, Texas, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:99-CV-45-C -------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Charles Leigh Berkley, Texas prisoner # 809353, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil lawsuit alleging wrongful foreclosure and failure to properly service bank accounts.

However, he briefs no argument that the district court erred in its conclusion; he has thus waived the sole ground for appeal, and his appeal is DISMISSED. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993)(arguments must be briefed in order to be preserved for appeal); Fed. R. App. P. 28(A)(9)(A); Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-10975 -2- Berkley also moves for the appointment of counsel and “to proceed.” His motions are DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.