U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

Derrow v. Bales

Derrow v. Bales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 16, 2000

Derrow v. Bales

Opinion

No. 99-20781 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20781 Conference Calendar

MICHAEL JOSEPH DERROW, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN MALCOLM BALES ET AL., Defendants, JOHN MALCOLM BALES, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CV-380 -------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction, on our own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987).

A plaintiff who successfully moves for voluntary dismissal without prejudice cannot appeal the district court’s order granting the same. See LeCompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc., 528 F.2d 601, 603 (5th Cir. 1976). Because the district court granted the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-20781 -2- motion of Michael Joseph Derrow, federal inmate #03199-286, which sought voluntary dismissal of the complaint so that Derrow would not be burdened with the $150 filing fee, there is nothing for Derrow to appeal. See id. APPEAL DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.