Deemer v. Goynes-Clark
Deemer v. Goynes-Clark
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30624 Summary Calendar
ROBERT DEEMER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ROXIE F. GOYNES-CLARK; KIMBERLY LEMAIRE; WILLIAM L. KLINE; JOHNNY CREED; RICHARD L. STALDER, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections; STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CV-648-C -------------------- February 4, 2000
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert Deemer, Louisiana state prisoner #120219, appeals
from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as
frivolous. He argues that the defendants filed false documents
in a state-court proceeding, that defendant Stalder subjected him
to rules that Stalder lacked the authority to enact, that he was
denied access to the Administrative Remedy Procedure, that
Stalder violated his right to equal protection under the law by
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-30624 -2-
discriminating against him because he was housed in extended
lockdown, that his good-time credits were improperly revoked, and
that defendant Creed improperly failed to take administrative
action and sanctioned the taking of Deemer’s property. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district
court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Deemer’s
complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower,
112 F.3d 191, 193(5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished