U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

Moore v. Ingalls Shipbuilding

Moore v. Ingalls Shipbuilding
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 17, 2000

Moore v. Ingalls Shipbuilding

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 99-60639 Summary Calendar __________________ ALVIN MOORE; MARY KING; ROBERT BROWN; JIMMIE DAILEY; SAMUEL WEBSTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (1:97-CV-615-BrR) ______________________________________________ February 17, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Appellants Alvin Moore, Mary King, Robert Brown, Jimmie Dailey, and Samuel Webster appeal from an adverse summary judgment dismissing a myriad of federal claims charging discrimination with respect to race, sex, age, and/or disability on the part of their employer and appellee Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. After reviewing the briefs on appeal and the record before the district court, our de novo review convinces us that the district court correctly granted summary judgment as to all

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. federal claims.** Accordingly, and essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Bramlette in his memorandum opinion and order dated August 19, 1999, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

** Appellants also asserted state law claims before the district court; however, the district court dismissed the state law claims without prejudice and such claims are not a subject of this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.