Rushing v. United States
Rushing v. United States
Opinion
No. 99-10189 -1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10189 Conference Calendar
LARRY HARVEL RUSHING,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-939-T -------------------- February 17, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larry Harvel Rushing has appealed the denial of his
application for a writ of coram nobis. He argues that the
district court erred in denying his application and that he is
entitled to such relief primarily because he lacked the requisite
criminal intent to support his convictions under
18 U.S.C. § 1014. Rushing has failed to meet his burden of showing that
the judicial proceedings leading to his guilty plea and
convictions were incorrect. He has therefore failed to
demonstrate that he is entitled to a writ of coram nobis. See
United States v. Dyer,
136 F.3d 417, 422(5th Cir. 1998). The
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-10189 -2-
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished