Smith v. Apfel
Smith v. Apfel
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 99-30470 Summary Calendar USDC No. 97-CV-1090 _________________
PEGGY JO SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
February 29, 2000
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Commissioner Kenneth S. Apfel (“the Commissioner”) denied Peggy Jo Smith’s application
for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. She appealed to the district court,
which referred the matter to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation (“R&R”). The R&R recommended affirming the Commissioner, and when Smith failed to object to the R&R, the
district court adopted the R&R’s reaso ning and affirmed. Smith appealed and the Commissioner
moved to dismiss, arguing that she forfeited her right to appeal. We agree that this case falls within
our rule that a party who does not object to an R&R loses her right to appeal. See Douglass v.
United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1417(5th Cir. 1996). The R&R clearly gave Smith notice
of the time period within which she had to file objections and she failed to respond.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Nor are we persuaded by Smith’s argument that we should forgive her forfeiture because of
attorney illness and because she filed a Rule 60(b) motion with the district court over one month after
she retained new counsel. We have not previously recognized this exception to the forfeiture rule and
Smith provides no reason why we should recognize it here, particularly given her failure to document
her attorney’s illness or to show that her Rule 60(b) motion was procedurally proper.
Because Smith forfeited her appellate rights by not objecting to the R&R, we review only for
plain error. See
id.Finding none, we DISMISS.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished