Edwards v. Richey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Edwards v. Richey

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________

No.99-50627 _______________________

BYARD EDWARDS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

R. GAINES GRIFFIN,

Appellant,

versus

H. L. RICHEY; I. KEITH GORDAN; MARK W. TURNBOUGH,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Pecos Lower Court No. P-98-CV-65 _________________________________________________________________ March 3, 2000

Before JONES, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the briefs, oral argument and pertinent portions of the record.

The factual basis for the trial court’s imposition of sanctions

does not appear to be clearly erroneous. We conclude, however,

that the amount of sanctions imposed represents an abuse of

discretion, given such factors as the short time between

plaintiffs’ discovery that they were mistaken about the factual

basis for the lawsuit and their offer to dismiss the case. Under

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. all the circumstances, the sanction should not have exceeded

$11,500.00.

The judgment is AFFIRMED as MODIFIED to reflect a

sanction award of $11,500.00.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished