IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________

m 99-11328 Summary Calendar _______________

DONNA J. STEVENS-SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS

GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:99-CV-1020) _________________________ April 5, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and retaliation. PARKER, Circuit Judges. It is evident that Stevens-Smith was fired PER CURIAM:* because, as she admits, she refused to follow her supervisor’s specific instruction to change Donna Stevens-Smith sued her former her method of processing her work. As the employer for sexual harassment and retaliation district court found, most of the statements of under title VII. In a comprehensive which she complains were made beyond the memorandum opinion and order entered on limitations period, but even assuming November 3, 1999, the district court carefully arguendo that this action is not time-barred, explained that Stevens-Smith has produced no none of the alleged actions or statements can summary judgment evidence of harassment or fairly be deemed sexual harassment or retaliation.

Stevens-Smith bases her claim on little * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has more than self-serving speculation designed to determined that this opinion should not be published obscure poor job performance. Essentially for and is not precedent except under the limited the reasons persuasively set forth by the circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

2