U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Haughton

United States v. Haughton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 17, 2000

United States v. Haughton

Opinion

No. 99-20569 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20569 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK LLOYD HAUGHTON, also known as Frederick L. Haughton, also known as F.L. Haughton, also known as F. Haughton, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-72-1 -------------------- April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Frederick Lloyd Haughton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Haughton has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has not filed a response to the motion to withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-20569 -2- CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.