Ndatah v. Cox
Ndatah v. Cox
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10565 Summary Calendar
I S NDATAH, Plaintiff-Appellant versus JACK COX, SR; TENNELL ATKINS; RODNEY DEBAUN; GARY WITHERSPOON; CATHERINE WITHERSPOON; GEORGE DAY; JESSE E THOMPSON; WINSTON SCOTT MCINTOSH; ROBERT GILGORE; CHRIS KNABEL; ASIF BUTT; COLIN DEVALLY; RODERICK BEMMINGS; GLENN FENECH; JERRY COLLIVER; MOHAMMED EL HUJJ ABRAHAM; H C PASRAM; FILDMENO CARDOSO; DJONDO MESSAN KOFFL; BOBBIE COON; CHERYL PHILLIPS; SHARON DUNCAN also known as Lee Lewalling; DANA ALHAWAJ, also known as Dana Jones; BROADMOOR APARTMENTS; OAKPARK APARTMENTS; AIRCRAFT INSURANCE; DALLAS JET CENTER INC; ARLINGTON JET CENTER INC Defendants-Appellees
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-309-X June 9, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Ndatah appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights and RICO claims. The district court dismissed Ndatah's RICO and constitutional claims as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We review a dismissal under that provision for abuse of discretion. See Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). After a careful review of the record, we are persuaded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Ndatah's civil rights and RICO claims.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.