United States v. Lucero-Sandoval
United States v. Lucero-Sandoval
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-51041 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALVARO LUCERO-SANDOVAL, also known as Felipe Lozano-Alaniz, also known as Ramon Rodriguez-Sandoval, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-99-CR-510-DB -------------------- June 13, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Alvaro Lucero-Sandoval appeals from his conviction for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lucero-Sandoval moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that his prior removal proceedings violated principles of due process. The district court denied the motion to dismiss on the basis that Lucero-Sandoval had not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the alleged defects in the prior removal proceedings. Lucero-Sandoval argues that the district court * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-51041 -2-
erred in holding that he was required to establish prejudice, but he concedes that this argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 656-60 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 838 (2000). The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.