UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 99-60520 _______________________

GRAND OAKS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARTHUR W. ANDERSON; JERRY HOLLINGSWORTH, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (3:94-CV-159-S-D) _________________________________________________________________ July 14, 2000 Before JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and WALTER*, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:** The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments and pertinent portions of the record.

Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact. In particular, considering Hollingsworth’s crucial role in the

* District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. development of Grand Oaks, we cannot say that there was insufficient evidence under the Boeing standard to send this case to the jury. See Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365, 374 (5th Cir. 1969). As to Anderson, there was clearly sufficient evidence to support the verdict. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.