Watkins v. Benson
Watkins v. Benson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60759 Conference Calendar
JOHNEIL WATKINS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus EDWARD O. BENSON, Defendant-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:99-CV-592-W-S -------------------- June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Johneil Watkins, Jr., Mississippi prisoner #47464 Q210, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous because the defendant was not a state actor. In his appellate brief, Watkins outlines his allegations against the defendant; contends that the defendant acted unethically and swindled his family; and argues that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint without allowing him to present evidence to support it. Watkins’s brother moves to supplement the record; that motion is DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-60759 -2- Watkins does not contend that the defendant was a state actor, as is required to pursue relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981). Watkins has failed to brief the sole ground for the dismissal of his action.
Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Moreover, the district court need not have allowed Watkins to present evidence before dismissing the action.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
Watkins’s appeal is frivolous and is dismissed. The dismissal of Watkins’s action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the dismissal of this appeal counts as a second “strike.” See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Watkins is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three “strikes” under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTION DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.